I was dismayed upon hearing that President Barack Obama was
the first sitting president to ever visit
a prison. This was all the worse after having learned that there are more
African Americans imprisoned today than there were slaves in the 1850s. As one
interviewee put it, “once you are convicted of a crime, you are, in essence, a
slave of the state.” Though this may sound dramatic, it’s true: there is a
clause written into the 13th amendment only allowing for the
“involuntary servitude” of convicted criminals detained by the state. This
criminality clause, as we have learned about race in general throughout the
semester, is a tool used to exploit. The film points out the irony that one out
of every four prisoners in the world is “locked up here in the land of the
free.” It’s undeniable that this is a deeply racial issue – the criminalization
of blacks allowed for the Southern economy to be rebuilt after the Civil War.
Today, mass incarceration serves as the “New Jim Crow” due to African Americans
being disproportionally represented in the criminal justice system by a massive
amount
When crack
emerged as a cheaper form of powder cocaine, it became popular among African
American populations who were experiencing heightened poverty; laws were passed
to make sentencing and punishment far harsher for crack cocaine than for powder
cocaine, adding to the disproportionate incarceration of African Americans. The
role of the president – past, current, future – has had profound impacts on this
legislation pertaining to the criminal justice system. This consequently has
profound impacts on the criminalization of blacks in the U.S, which has had
profound impacts on all aspects of black communities across the country. Police
violence is a reflection of mass incarceration, which authorizes brutal treatment
of African Americans in order to be “tough on crime.”
The Nixon administration was
particularly detrimental. John Ehrlichman, a key Nixon advisor, was
(unknowingly) recorded exposing the truth of their agenda: “by getting the
public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then
criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest
their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night
after night on evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of
course we did.” The Reagan administration ratcheted up the War on Drugs,
supposedly in response to a crack cocaine “crisis” in African American
communities; though many believe that this escalation was announced before
crack cocaine even arrived in most inner city neighborhoods. Bill Clinton
contributed to the problem behind the guise of being “tough on crime.” 673,000
more people ended up in prison during Clinton’s administration – 235,000 more
than during Reagan’s. He heaped mounds of coal on the fire: the
three-strikes-and-you’re-out sentencing, mandatory minimums for crack and
cocaine possession, huge funding of prisons (and additional funding for states
that punished convicts severely), the limiting of judges ability to to
determine sentences, and so on and so on.
As Common raps in his song “Letter
to the Free” (which is featured in the film), “prison is a business, America’s
the company.” Huge money is made off of the criminal justice system. It can be
likened to slavery here, too, in that not only is it a pervasive institution,
it is also a moneymaking business. There are a host of corporations benefiting
off of mass incarceration, using inmate labor to produce products and goods.
Think food supply companies like Aramark (yes, the same Aramark that provides
our meals here at Rhodes), telecommunications companies like Global Tel* Link,
healthcare companies like Corizon, telemarketing and call centers, clothing
manufacturers like Victoria’s Secret and JCPenny, the technology sector, and
the bail industry. The good news is, in August, Obama and the Department of
Justice announced that the federal government would cease use of private prison
facilities. The bad news is, though Hillary Clinton supported these measures, Trump does not –
in fact, the morning after his election, the Corrections Corporations of
America rose 40%. With Trump a successful business mogul, we should expect a
continued rise in private prison stocks, especially due to his focus on immigration
and crime.
When it seems as if bad news is
relentless, and there is nothing we can do to stop the negative headlines from
piling up, I have found myself asking what I can do. Though I don’t entirely
know the answer to that question yet, I think we, as average Americans, should
follow the lead of Civil Rights activists and employ the power of boycotts. It
doesn’t take long to do the research necessary to find out just which companies
are making money off of the criminalization and exploitation of black and brown
Americans. We can stop giving them our money, we can expose them, we can spread
these numbers, this history, and the implications of these policies as far and
wide as possible. We can continue to educate ourselves and take advantage of
opportunities to educate those around us on the ugly truth of mass
incarceration. And we can unlearn the narrative we have been shown and told that African Americans,
particularly African American men, are lazy, are criminals, and are at fault for
the hardships they experience. The more we know, the better we can hold
ourselves accountable and hold our officials and politicians accountable for
the rhetoric and the policies that can devastate entire communities.
OTHER SOURCES:
http://www.salon.com/2015/04/13/the_clinton_dynastys_horrific_legacy_how_tough_on_crime_politics_built_the_worlds_largest_prison/
I had no idea that no President had ever visited a prison in our country before. Although this is surprising to hear, it tends to make sense because there doesn't seem to be a need for someone who is imprisoned to be visited by the sitting President of the United States of America. That individual has broken the law and has therefore violated laws set forth by our forefathers as well as the President. The issue about drugs has always been concerning and disputed because there are so many people that are actively doing such even though it is an illegal activity. Drugs are a huge problem and because of such people lose their lives, their loved ones, and their jobs or potential jobs because of usage. As with anything there are stereotypes for certain things and certain groups of people and drugs are not excluded from such. As human beings we search for differences between things in order to find ways to describe things we do not know or understand.
ReplyDeleteWhen I watched this documentary, I was absolutely shocked by the War on Drugs. It was honestly something that I had never learned about previously, so hearing about the hidden motives behind it shocked me even more than the fact that it existed at all. It blows my mind that something this malicious and thought out is still going on. The fact that I didn't even know anything about it saddens me as well, because it shows how corrupt our system truly is in not making something like this a major topic of discussion.
ReplyDeleteI would generally disagree with the above comment that the president has no real reason to visit those in prisons. As you highlighted in the blog, the president has an incredibly important influence on legislation and generally which ideals are supported. By visiting prisons and those incarcerated within them, the president shows is alignment with the citizens that are victims of the War on Drugs and also shows his alliance with those attempting to change the system that oppresses African-Americans disproportionately more than any other group. Though they did indeed violate a law, it is important that the president serves as an ally to ALL citizens, especially those who have been discriminated against. On a larger scale, the president also has a responsibility to oversee the justice system as a whole, since he does serve as the head of the country and its ongoings. To me, it seems intuitively like the right thing to do to be aware of the conditions under which all Americans live, whether criminal or not.
ReplyDeleteThere are so many shocking truths within 13th that are difficult to be confronted with. Tracing the corruption of our society and justice system back to the 60's with Nixon and then forward with Clinton's three strikes bill makes you question the very core of America's government. It is terrifying to realize that so many large companies and industries have such a large stock within the modern prison complex.
ReplyDelete