The media has always played a
role in popularizing events that occur in the world; however, it seems that within
the past two decades the media has played an even bigger position in
highlighting events. Previously in our class we learned that in the past, public
lynching would be broadcast in newspapers, or on post cards. During this era,
cell phones and color-print cameras were nonexistent. People would hear about
an event through word of mouth and from the newspaper, which typically postponed
their reportage of the events. Today, news about current events is almost
immediate. Within minutes, people across the world hear the news about an
event. With the advancement of the internet, cellphones, social media, and
other devices, anyone can be notified about serious world issues that are
happening.
I think that this advancement in technology is definitely
a benefit in shining the light on issues, but it also has its detriments. With
police brutality becoming more prevalent in society, I think that having body
cameras is a must. There have been multiple instances where a black life has
been taken by a police officer because that police officer felt that their life
was “in danger.” When these police officers go to court because they killed a
person, in the past those cases have been dismissed. In our society, if a white
male cop is confronting a black suspect, most of the time the white officer
wins; however, as body cameras become mandatory, hopefully cops will stop
taking advantage and targeting people of color. This actually makes it safer
for both sides. The other day I watched a video of a white male officer pull
over a black man because his car had tinted windows. The black man was an
undercover officer who videotaped his experience with this white cop, who was
clearly not qualified to be an officer. The white cop grabbed the man’s arm for
no reason and eventually pointed a gun at his face. The black cop remained calm
the entire time; he never said anything threatening or performed any actions
that would have caused the officer to feel as though his life was in danger.
Thankfully, the black officer taped his situation because the white officer was
eventually fired and brought up on charges. This event was definitely not the
first time that an officer has taken advantage of his power, and I think that
in these situations technology and the media is powerful in educating society
and protecting suspects.
Unfortunately, I also think that the media is also able
to do harm. This more frequently occurs to people that are nonwhite, for when
they commit a crime, their full arrest record gets published. Not only that,
but their story is sometimes fabricated and intensified to make them look like
a threatening criminal. Having one’s name published in newspapers and on the
internet makes them an outcast in society. Although the media is good at
popularizing events, it can also dirty some one’s name. The main reason why I
think the media (especially social media) can be a problem is because it can
fictionalize stories which can go viral in minutes. I think that the media can
add flame to a fire, but I also think that it is able to quell the storm by
shedding light on it. Overall, without the media and technology, the world
would be delayed on being informed about issues, and by that time, events would
be forgotten.
I definitely agree that body cameras are a valuable asset when the details of an incident are unclear. However, it seems that they haven't been of too much help so far. There are a few cases that I'm thinking of in which the jury did not rule in favor of what the video obviously showed, which is incredibly frustrating and confusing. Regardless, I think that we would be worse off without them and hope that they ultimately help to bring justice to a system that desperately needs it.
ReplyDeleteI think technology and the constant reporting of the media can also build up a numbness towards what is going on. While innovations on social media such as Facebook Live have been extremely useful in the instant reporting of situations of police brutality, social media sites are also used to turn a person and their life into just another hashtag. The videos are re-circulated so much that it is easy to build a numbness to them and almost forget what you're fighting for, while at the same time drawing awareness to the names and stories of those who have fallen at the hands of people who are abusing their positions of power. I don't know how to achieve or think there could ever be a happy medium between society and technology usage.
ReplyDeleteI agree that body cameras are helpful in navigating all of these situations that are unfortunately too often clouded by race. However, I hope we don't supply body cameras and then stop there. Body cameras, while helpful, will not stop the abuse of power or change our society enough to stop living by stereotypes and fear.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Zaria about numbness caused by social media. It seems as if every time I open facebook, I am greeted with videos of police brutality. While this is definitely heartbreaking, I feel as if I have begun to go numb to the chilling feelings that these videos instill because they are everywhere you look. This constant state of connection that can bring people together instantly, can also serve to overstimulate people and desensitize them to violence
ReplyDeleteI agree that the media can be detrimental especially with how the media portrays protests. Many protests are portrayed with the actions of one or two people representing the whole protest. These actions in many cases are portrayed as violent and in a negative manner. However, choosing to use these actions in the media to represent the protest at whole is falsifying the message and movement of the protest.
ReplyDeleteUsing body cameras with police officers would help to provide the actual situation. I agree that body cameras could be really helpful to clear up the truth in cases instead of cases solely being accusations without any proof.
You're right, the media is like a double-edged sword. As others have mentioned, their are pros (body cameras providing us hard evidence of what happened) and cons (numbness to victims of any crime because we see it on the news or in our news feeds/timelines everyday). The fact of the matter is the media will never be truly good to and for us. One example being the 2016 election cycle. I say this because even new technology, the media is still subjective moreso than it ever has been. Two people can watch the same video of a police officer shooting someone and come to two different conclusions. I recognize this may sound very Platonic, but our sense deprive us of the ability to have true knowledge or be objective on any matter. Juries, judges, news anchors, and everyone else relies upon our sense to form opinions and make decisions. The issue is that everyone does not perceive things the same way. As a result, the media, despite its diversity, does not provide us with an objective account of ongoing news.
ReplyDelete